I have mentioned doing this before but never took the time to document it and I have some interesting results on my website here: https://c3junkie.com/?page_id=2028
For those too lazy to click on my website, I will copy some of it here:
All ammo used was my 3.7Gr Titegroup under a 147Gr projectile. All testing done yesterday.
Baseline.
The test below has expected results:
Test below has expected results and I think this what I did a long time ago before the first run of BarrelXchange Mini Heavy bolts came out. Again, the bolt is lighter than a FS UZI bolt so obviously it should run faster than the full size bolt.
This test is what has me confused, I would have logically thought being 1.4oz HEAVIER than the FS Uzi bolt that we should be running less than 577 but it is faster.
I know the timer is good and you can definitely hear and feel the difference in the cyclic rates. I presume that the location of the mass is what is different here. Very interesting nonetheless.
For those too lazy to click on my website, I will copy some of it here:
All ammo used was my 3.7Gr Titegroup under a 147Gr projectile. All testing done yesterday.
Baseline.
The test below has expected results:
Test below has expected results and I think this what I did a long time ago before the first run of BarrelXchange Mini Heavy bolts came out. Again, the bolt is lighter than a FS UZI bolt so obviously it should run faster than the full size bolt.
This test is what has me confused, I would have logically thought being 1.4oz HEAVIER than the FS Uzi bolt that we should be running less than 577 but it is faster.
I know the timer is good and you can definitely hear and feel the difference in the cyclic rates. I presume that the location of the mass is what is different here. Very interesting nonetheless.