WTK Value of Group Industries Uzi

bmg

Member
Feedback: 0 / 0 / 0
Joined
Mar 5, 2003
Messages
6
Location
N. Idaho
Would a full-sized Group Industries SMG (c 1988) be worth any more or less than a Vector UZI of similar condition?

Thanks, Jim
 

KarlPMann

Banned
Feedback: 0 / 0 / 0
Joined
Dec 25, 2002
Messages
1,657
That would be a matter of opinion. To a real serious collector who wanted all the different varieties, yes. As far as the average buyer goes, most likely not. The Vector has the same receiver plus the added benefit of a factory 1 year warranty plus additional service for as long as Vector survives. The GI gun would therefore be worth a hair less IMHO. Karl.

And :welcome .
 

bmg

Member
Feedback: 0 / 0 / 0
Joined
Mar 5, 2003
Messages
6
Location
N. Idaho
Thanks. That's kind of what I thought.

I think I've only seen one in the past year and it was listed at about $600 more than what I expected.
 

Paul556

UZI Talk Supporter
Feedback: 1 / 0 / 0
Joined
Dec 26, 2002
Messages
469
Location
Houston, TX
My vote is with Karl. There is a lot of value added with a Vector. As long as Vector stays in business that value is there.
 

bmg

Member
Feedback: 0 / 0 / 0
Joined
Mar 5, 2003
Messages
6
Location
N. Idaho
Wouldn't Vector also work on a Group Industries gun (for repair)?

If the Vector is used and a year old and the warranty is over, it seems like the value from a support/warranty perspective would be on par because it would cost the same to have a specific repair performed (by Vector).
 

KarlPMann

Banned
Feedback: 0 / 0 / 0
Joined
Dec 25, 2002
Messages
1,657
OK, something I just noticed. 1988. If that's a correct year, it's a post sample and aint worth much. If that was just a guess and it's really a transferrable, I stick with my first statement. Karl.
 

bmg

Member
Feedback: 0 / 0 / 0
Joined
Mar 5, 2003
Messages
6
Location
N. Idaho
My mistake. It is a transferable. I didn't remember the exact manufacture date; I just remembered that the original owner bought it new about 2 years before GI went out of business. It is currently on a Form 4 in transfer to my dealer.
 

KarlPMann

Banned
Feedback: 0 / 0 / 0
Joined
Dec 25, 2002
Messages
1,657
bmg said:
My mistake. It is a transferable. I didn't remember the exact manufacture date; I just remembered that the original owner bought it new about 2 years before GI went out of business. It is currently on a Form 4 in transfer to my dealer.

OK, as a transferrable, like I said. I think it's worth just a hair under a Vector right now. Next silly question. If it's on a form 4, how is your dealer in your state getting it transferred to him? Karl.
 

bmg

Member
Feedback: 0 / 0 / 0
Joined
Mar 5, 2003
Messages
6
Location
N. Idaho
An individual can ship a MG to an out of state dealer, just like an individual can ship a Title 2 gun to an out of state dealer. It saves time (and possibly money) because it eliminates the transfer from the out of state individual to the out of state dealer. I've done this once before.

However, a dealer cannot ship to an individual in a different state.

Forgot to mention: In the above interstate transfer, it transfers on a Form 4, not a Form 3.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.

Please Visit our Sister Sites Below

Sister Board - Sturmgewehr Sister Board - MachinegunBoards


Please consider becoming an UZI Talk Supporter
Top