Why did HK abandon the roller lock system?

Gaujo

UZI Talk Supporter
Feedback: 10 / 0 / 1
Joined
Sep 11, 2013
Messages
4,373
Location
Raleigh, NC
It seems like a great system, so why don't they still incorporate roller locking into their newer designs?
 
Last edited:

ATL_Matt

Well-known member
Feedback: 0 / 0 / 0
Joined
Apr 4, 2010
Messages
146
I'm a huge roller lock fan - have almost all models and agree, great platform. My guess is cost & complexity though I have no facts to back that up. Matt
 

A&S Conversions

UZI Talk Life Member
Feedback: 5 / 0 / 0
Joined
Mar 9, 2006
Messages
2,828
Location
Southern New Hampshire
My limited understanding is the short answer is profit. The bolt, locking pieces, trunnion, and barrel need tighter tolerances and are more complicated to machine than the blow back UMP and the short stroke piston systems that HK currently produces. The blow back polymer UMP costs half the money to produce than the welded MP5 but sold for about the same money. The same could be said for the G36 series compared to the HK53, 33K, and 33.

Being a huge fan of the roller locked system, with a Fleming sear and over 20 hosts, I think it is a cool system. But look at the prices. I can buy a Colt AR carbine for under $600. A foreign made roller locked "clone" will be over double that. Even with cheap foreign labor, the machine work with tight tolerances still makes these guns very expensive to produce. And look at the HK SP5K. $2,500 is a lot of money to me.

It is my understanding that no industrialized nation uses the roller locked system in their issue firearms. This is old dead technology. Several years ago Malaysia (a third world country IMHO) sold out of their HK33 rifles and invested in M16s. So if Malaysia doesn't want them who does, other than collectors here in the states? A polymer receiver could be made, as Special Weapons made the SP 10 with roller locked mechanism and polymer receiver. The bolt needs to be reworked such that the extractor spring can't be hyper extended. Why HK never fixed that is beyond me. This is just my opinion.

Scott
 

rhouston8

UZI Talk Life Member
Feedback: 9 / 0 / 0
Joined
Jan 8, 2010
Messages
1,095
Roller locks are too expensive to produce and maintain.
The day of the subgun has passed which kills the MP5 line basically.
The extractor spring is a weakness of the system ( def for subguns).
 

Twinsen

Well-known member
Feedback: 0 / 0 / 0
Joined
Sep 16, 2009
Messages
45
Modern gas systems are superior in terms of length, weight, bolt velocity, maintenance period, versatility, etc, so roller locked rifles are out of style.
SMGs have been replaced by rifle caliber carbines, so roller delayed SMGs are dead along with all other kinds. Nobody is buying millions of Kris Vectors, Sterlings, Grease Guns, either.
 

StooperZero

Well-known member
Feedback: 52 / 0 / 0
Joined
Aug 2, 2006
Messages
4,920
Location
PA
yep why buy a $$$$$$$$$ 9mm gun when police/gov'ts can get a gun in 5.56 or 308 in the same size for a fraction of the price.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.

Please Visit our Sister Sites Below

Sister Board - Sturmgewehr Sister Board - MachinegunBoards


Please consider becoming an UZI Talk Supporter
Top