woodenword
UZI Talk Supporter

So, tell me about the .32ACP VZ61 Skorpion. For some reason I’m wanting to pick one of these up and SBR it. But I’ve never even shot one!
:dunno
:dunno
At least to me, if you are the one on the Form 1 as the "Maker" then you are the person to change the configuration of the pistol (which is not subject to foreign parts count) to a Short Barreled Rifle (which is subject to foreign parts count) as 922(R) makes no mention as to whether the non sporting use configured semi automatic mag fed rifle is a Title I or Title II firearm. I have not heard of a case where an individual was singularly charged with a 922(R) violation. Of course as posted above, it would be more challenging to find a private individual with documentation of the Manufacturing of a Title I rifle. But unless you bought and transferred a Title II SBR, if you filed the Form 1, you did the manufacturing. So do you feel lucky?
Scott
did any of the FA version of this ever make it into the registry?
Suppressed Skorpion SBR could be interesting.
So, tell me about the .32ACP VZ61 Skorpion. For some reason I’m wanting to pick one of these up and SBR it. But I’ve never even shot one!
:dunno
Thanks for the response. I don’t suppose anyone makes 922r compliant parts for the vz61? It is very confusing. One of the websites of the companies ( I think Czechpoint) makes no mention of US parts count when advertising the stocks and stock brackets. It does state you must file a form 1 to put them together on the pistol. Because the website makes no mention of 922r it almost gives the impression it doesn’t apply. I mean, if they are telling you to file a form 1 to make a SBR, then wouldn’t they also tell you to add 922r parts if that was required? Oh well, I think the wisest thing to do is to just shoot it as a pistol.