I don’t think there is a right answer. I included a link to a posted copy of the memo. As I mentioned, it’s about 10 years old now, so I don’t know how much still holds true. I generally found it persuasive though, which is part of why I favor 9mm (the other and maybe more important aspect for me being weight/size). I have no doubt .45 will get the job done and still shoot it regularly.I prefer .45ACP precisely because it expands most out of all the common pistol calibers and modern versions meet FBI penetration standards. Then again, .45 FMJ is still pretty wide but the problem with 9mm before was either insufficient penetration or insufficient wound size, while modern 9mm can do both. My logic, though, is the same tech that advanced 9mm also advanced .45 and .45ACP already starts out wider. Winchester Ranger T expands to a full 1”, which is why I use it as my Para Ordnance 1911 carry load. But if it doesn’t work with a MAC, then I’ll want some other kind of defensive oriented load.
FBI Memo