Re: Mini or full size
Vmon said:
Rex is going to install a special cocking lug on the mini's top cover so it can chamber the micro bolt.
Vmon, I'm curious. Did you tell Rex my idea of making a special cocking lug or did he already do one?
Vmon said:
I hope that B&G metal is as strong as Uzi metal for the sake of the sear feet
TMK, B&G never made any bolts. They registered factory IMI and Group bolts.
Vmon said:
My only questiona are: Do the SA receivers/trunions on any of the three Uzi's have to be modified to properly accept the front feet of a mini/micro bolt? If, so does the rifle become an illegal machine gun when the bolt is not installed? If the gun does become an illegal machinegun, what can I do to prevent having to modify the receiver but to keep the gun functioning properly?
This is a long answer. I'll contact you off the boards with my number so you can call me if you want more details but here goes.
1.For the full size: no trunnion mods but then you can weld up that slot for extra weight for the MINI and MICRO application.
2. For the MINI: the trunnion would have to be relieved for a FACTORY IMI bolt but you should be able to make the feet more narrow and less tall than a factory IMI bolt and it will work.
3. For the MICRO/Pistol: I've seen a RR Uzi pistol at a Gun show that had very thin and small feet on the bolt. The seller also had a couple Uzi Pistols there. He let me take them both apart and compare the trunnions. The RR Uzi Pistols trunnion and the standard Uzi Pistol trunnions looked the same.
This distance between the receiver and trunnion is very small and the feet have to be very thin - too thin for my tastes.
But evidentally, someone figured that it was worth the effort to do this mod for that particular RR Uzi pistol. I would be concerned with them breaking.
Note that a factory MINI's receiver is shaped to accept the feet of the open bolt. The full size Uzi's are not shaped for this. In the case of the Vector MINI's which are cut downs from Full size Uzi's, Vector had to cut the receivers to allow the feet to poke through. On some of the Very early Vector MINI's, Vector just left the holes there and you wouldn't see them unless you looked down in the receiver or you removed the handguards to see them. Later Vector MINI's they welded over the holes.
So I'm guessing that if you had a registered bolt that had the feet for a MINI w/ an unmodified trunnion, it still may end up being kinda long and contacting the full size Uzi receiver.
But if you had the tiny feet like I've seen on that RR Uzi pistol then it make work on all three but then I'd be afraid of the feet breaking.
Vmon said:
Amphibian, why would you want to put a closed bolt in your Micro? The ROF must be insane! Wouldn't the micro be easier to control and be more reliable with an open bolt?
I'm getting the MICRO since I want to have the entire Uzi family in FA.
I want to have my Uzi's in all the configurations that IMI actually sold/made. I'm almost there. I have the full size. I have the MINI in both open and closed bolt. TMK, the MICRO was only offered in CLOSED bolt so I want CLOSED bolt for collecting reasons mainly. (I'm sure it will see some occasional use)
Actually my RR Uzi Pistol is pretty unusual as it's receiver has been modified to accept the MINI bolt, as well as having cuts in the bottom of the receiver to use the CLOSED bolt method as used in the FIREPOWER publications book as seen in this pic below:
It came to me in Open bolt configuration though. So I plan on having my MICRO setup in 3 variations:
Open bolt,
FACTORY IMI Closed bolt
and the "FIREPOWER Publications" Closed bolt configuration which looks more reliable than the Factory one as long as the parts hold up.