cockednlocked45
UZI Talk Supporter

I just got the email for this. 50% down-payment...


From watching the development of this from concept to this point, I’d say he’s going to make his timeline.
He brought it from concept to prototype in something like 6-8 months. He then produced 10 beta versions in a few weeks.
His 12-16 week ETA fits with the other timelines he’s delivered on.
(Fact check me on specifics but they’re something close to anyway)




I have no current plans for a 22lr belt fed, buy maybe down the road. I agree completely that 22lr can be extremely difficult to run reliably in any full auto platform, let alone a belt fed.I have to ask, how many hours did you spend tweeting and even more importantly polishing to get it to run that long. In my mind, I think that is why belt fed .22lr is not viable. Yes, there were a few who got their belt fed .22s to run. But they were very methodical and patient to tweak and polish to get the upper to run. I remember story after story of the few who got their upper to run spent hours and hours, getting it to that point. Because of this, I never really followed the various flavors of .22 belt feds. Has anyone heard of any of them, even with break in, ever work coming out of the box, even with the hotter and more expensive CCI Mini Mags?
Certainly, the inventor of the Lima Six has great skills, but it has been shown that a belt fed .22 is for the tinkering crowd only. I recall seeing some of the .22 belt feds listed and later relisted again with something like, “The previous owner tried and failed to get the upper to run. I bought it with that knowledge. I can’t make it run either. So potential buyers, you have been warned “. Maybe he could make a reliable .22 belt fed. If he does, I wish him luck.
Scott
I never did join arfcom, specifically because of their aversion to anonymity. It has been my policy to never use my real name online ever, and that will never change. Heck, during one point when I did briefly decide that maybe joining would be worth it, they denied me because I used an "anonymous" email address. It was my yahoo account,...the only email address I had ever had at that point. That was to me a giant red flag;...anyone that red hot to be able to identify anyone and everyone HAS to be working for the forces of evil. So I've never been there, and ain't missing out on nuthin'.I don’t know, but with Private Equity buying YouTube channels, and how focused AR15 is about the money, I wouldn’t be surprised if Private Equity owns them. Back in the day, AR15 seemed to have very little oversight. It also tended to be a younger crowd. The username anonymity seemed to bring out more personal attacks.
I have found this site to be more community based. I can disagree with your opinion without attacking you personally. I think that Social Media in general has gotten far less civil and it seems that social discourse bumps up clicks which increases advertising revenue. And the money seems to be, more and more, the point of having these sites. The people who start such sites as this one, seem to do so for the love of the subject and the community of like minded that it develops. Whether social media, housing market, or any number of aspects of everyday life, it seems Private Equity wants to buy it, squeeze all the value out of it, and throw it away. From my perspective, our society seems to be headed in the “all of us are surfs making just enough to survive and the Lords living off the wealth that we should share in.
(Climbing down off the soap box) And now back to our regularly scheduled programming.
Scott

The top one is a Shrike/MCR and the bottom is a FM9. I thought this was a Lima Six thread?