




No. It’s bullshit. I have no idea what design they are referring to that has been proven “for years” in combat with the US military but it’s not the terminator shotgun.. all I can think of is that they are simply referring to the reciprocating barrel mechanism of the terminator shotgun.. which could be compared to the M2 machine gun, Barret M82, or Johnson 1941 rifle.. but even that is a stretch, as the terminator uses a very odd reciprocating action to fire.. it has a fixed firing pin built into the breech block at the rear end of the receiver, a shell is placed into the chamber of the barrel and when the trigger is pulled, the barrel slams backwards under spring tension slamming the shell into the firing pin. It’s basically a reverse open bolt mechanism… very similar to one of the slam fire 12ga zip guns made from 2 pieces of pipe with a nail at the rear end.The Terminator was used by the United States and other countries armed forces?
It is a bogus ploy that is notoriously overused by RPB and SWD. A brief scan of the 1981 RPB industries catalog reveals this sales tactic used many times. According to that catalog the 10” Barrel M10 uppers were designed for a special military contract, as well as the M11 380 leather cutaway holsters and various other items. I have my doubts that any of these items were ever used by any branch of the US military."Used by the Government" is a rather vague term. For one example, I know that the U.S. Government bought at least a couple of the Segway two-wheel, self-balancing, battery powered personal transport "vehicles". One might say government employees would "use" them to zip around hallways and across the parking lots.
MHO, YMMV, etc.
Is it possible the "special military contracts" were from other countries militaries, not the US?It is a bogus ploy that is notoriously overused by RPB and SWD. A brief scan of the 1981 RPB industries catalog reveals this sales tactic used many times. According to that catalog the 10” Barrel M10 uppers were designed for a special military contract, as well as the M11 380 leather cutaway holsters and various other items. I have my doubts that any of these items were ever used by any branch of the US military.
I believe there was history of trying to sell to foreign countries. I'd have to look through the macman book again .Is it possible the "special military contracts" were from other countries militaries, not the US?
The original MAC company had a lot of small foreign orders here and there, but it wasn’t the original MAC company that was touting any of these accessories that were supposedly designed for “special government contracts”.. it was RPB and SWD that designed and sold those accessories, and those companies mainly dealt with civilian sales for the most part, with the occasional small foreign orders. As far as I’m aware, none of those items have ever turned up anywhere else in the world on any guns or otherwise.. just in the hands of American civilians.Is it possible the "special military contracts" were from other countries militaries, not the US?
Yes. In the MACMAN book there are detailed lists of the number of guns ordered by the US military by MAC, RPB and SWD. MACs were purchased and fielded by the US military as recently as the early 90s, by the Navy Seals. Other branches purchased them in limited quantities as well… that said, I have my doubts that they purchased any of the gimmicky upgrades or accessories for them. The navy SEALS did upgrade their MACs, the guys over at CRANE devised a larger charging handle for the MAC after an incident on an aircraft carrier doing night exercises in the rain when a charging handle slipped from a soldiers gloved hand and discharged the weapon into the flight deck. The larger navy seal charging handles pop up from time to time on the civilian market now, as the guns were destroyed at CRANE decades ago and the demilled chunks were sold on the civilian market, including the large charging handles.In the May 1978 issue of Soldier of Fortune magazine author Chuck Taylor recounts his experiences running parallel operations near the Laotion border during the Vietnam war. He ran into what he called a "Special Forces A-team member" who had been running multiple "snatch" operations with a team of other Special Forces guys. The Spec Ops guy said that his team had been using the Ingrams on their missions (plural).
I would assume the different military branches each procured their own quantities of MAC type weapons for testing and evaluation, and apparently some even fielded the weapons, if even on a limited basis

