I know that the people making the decisions probably don't see it this way, but according to the definition:
It would seem that any transferable machinegun on the registry should be on the curio and relic list. The very fact that the it is on the registry gives a machinegun a substantial part of it's monetary value, making it a curio. It also makes machineguns that can be owned by civilians rare, unusual, and intriguing...the definition of a curio.
Firearm curios or relics include firearms which have special value to collectors because they possess some qualities not ordinarily associated with firearms intended for sporting use or as offensive or defensive weapons. To be recognized as curios or relics, firearms must fall within one of the following categories:
- Have been manufactured at least 50 years prior to the current date, but not including replicas thereof; or
- Be certified by the curator of a municipal, State, or Federal museum which exhibits firearms to be curios or relics of museum interest; or
- Derive a substantial part of their monetary value from the fact that they are novel, rare, bizarre, or from the fact of their association with some historical figure, period, or event.
It would seem that any transferable machinegun on the registry should be on the curio and relic list. The very fact that the it is on the registry gives a machinegun a substantial part of it's monetary value, making it a curio. It also makes machineguns that can be owned by civilians rare, unusual, and intriguing...the definition of a curio.